In a Lawsuit, ex-Union Coach Peter Nowak Provides all the Reasons Why He is an Asshole

Kyle Scott —  July 24, 2012 — 8 Comments

image from mobilwi.typepad.com

Several times over the past year, we told you that (now ex-)Union coach Peter Nowak was an asshole. Now we have some evidence… provided by Nowak’s lawyer in a wrongful termination lawsuit filed against the Union last week. Documents from the lawsuit were obtained by Philly.com.

Screen Shot 2012-07-24 at 12.02.30 PM

The details:

In June, Union CEO Nick Sakiewicz announced at a press conference that Nowak had been fired. The announcement wasn’t much of a surprise, as it came in the midst of a lousy start for the Union and on the heels of a report that Nowak was actively seeking the head coaching position with Hearts, of the Scottish Premier League. It was clear that there was some friction between Nowak and the front office, players, and even fans. Still, though, the team softened the language at the press conference, saying only that Nowak had “stepped down.” Against his will, of course.

What really happened?

The Union told Nowak he was being fired and gave him one of two options: either sign a termination agreement (this one) that would pay him only through only the end of 2012 – not 2015, like his contract (this one) stipulated – or don’t sign, in which case he would not be paid any severance and his contract would not be honored based on reasons (causes) that were detailed in a letter to Nowak (this one). 

In the lawsuit (this one), Nowak, who was to be paid roughly $400,000 a year through 2015, claims wrongful termination, citing a clause in his contract (this one) that states he be given 15 days to “cure the occurrence” of any cause for termination. Of course, the lawsuit makes no mention of the sentence that follows that clause: except that Club shall have no obligation to provide Manager such opportunity to cure if Club determines, in its good faith judgment, that the occurrence is of a nature that is not curable or that Manager's continued  employment during a cure period could be reasonably be expected to result in material harm to Club.

Translated: If the Manager is such a colossal asshole beyond repair, and keeps trading away our best players, we can fire him without notice

Nowak's lawyer left that part out.

The letter detailing those causes for termination (this one) is awesome, along with the separation agreement detailing Nowak's two options (take the severance or receive nothing), were given to Nowak on the day he was fired– there was no 15-day notice. 

So what were the causes, you ask? Mr. Nowak’s attorney included the letter in the lawsuit, and I can’t imagine it is going to help his client, either in this case or in the long-term.

You can read the entire thing here, but here's the fun part:

various material breaches of League Rules (including the League's Collective Bargaining Agreement), including physical confrontations with players and officials during a Team game resulting in a fine and multi-game suspension, interfering with the rights of Team players to contact the players' union with concerns, subjecting Team players to inappropriate hazing activities and engaging in behavior that put the health and safety of Team players at risk.

material breaches of the Employment Agreement, including engaging in discussions regarding, and otherwise actively seeking, employment by other professional soccer teams in Europe and making disparaging remarks to third parties regarding Club, its management and its ownership

demonstrating gross negligence, including putting the health and safety ofTeam players at risk by requiring injured players to participate in strenuous training activities, not allowing players to have water during such activities despite temperatures in excess of 80 degrees, ignoring the advice of the head athletic trainer regarding which players are healthy enough to play in games and participate in training sessions and creating an atmosphere where medical issues should be hid from medical staff and not treated.

committing actions that have reflected ill a materially adverse manner on the integrity, reputation and goodwill of Club and the Team (in the eyes of the League, U.S. Soccer, current and potential Team players, sponsors and fans), including the unusually harsh treatment of players described above, actions during Team games that have resulted in fines and suspensions, the multiple breaches of League Rules and a discussion (by you or your agent on your behalf) with the head of U.S. Soccer that was in very poor taste and leti a very bad impression with U.S. Soccer. 

multiple incidents of insubordination with respect to the Club's Chief Executive Officer, including claiming at one point (in direct contradiction to the terms of the Employment Agreement) that he does not report to the Club's Chief Executive Officer. 

various material breaches of Team Rules, including creating a hostile work environment and culture of fear for Team players and other front office employees by orally berating and physically intimidating fellow employees.

 

See, I told you he was an asshole. The Union are accusing Nowak of insubordination, endangering the health and well-being of players, embarrassing the team and league, and generally – as expected – being an asshole.

There are two sides to every story, though, and it seems like the Union aren’t exactly acting in good faith (rarely in sports are contracts not upheld). But, the claims against Nowak go well beyond technicalities. Fighting with players, seeking other employment, and endangering the health of athletes by going against the medical staff are serious offenses for a coach. The Union are clinging to them as reasons why they shouldn’t have to pay Nowak, but Nowak and his lawyer are grasping at a technicality in an effort to have the contract honored.

We’ll keep you updated.

Kyle Scott

Posts Twitter Facebook Google+

Editor

8 responses to In a Lawsuit, ex-Union Coach Peter Nowak Provides all the Reasons Why He is an Asshole

  1. Nowak clearly isn’t the warm and cuddly type, but if the counter-allegations are true, why has none of that come out from current or former players? Califf and LeToux didn’t hold back on Nowak’s lack of communication, but neither mentioned their health was endangered. The Union seem to be building a reputation for not paying what they owe on the other hand.

  2. Is this the only sport where the manager is allowed to trade players? How can you let him trade away your best players and then blame and sack him for it? He may be an AH but it seems like someone else should take the blame for the boring lackluster Union. Fans are cult like, and the team isnt even entertaining.

  3. OneManWolfpack July 24, 2012 at 1:16 pm

    @Tim – They didn’t trade him because he traded away players. They sacked him because he is a prick who treated players like cattle and made every single player earn a spot in the lineup… which doesn’t sound that bad but given the constantly changing lineup was clearly hurting the team, it obviously wasn’t working. He refused to change and listened to no one. The players weren’t playing for him and on top of that he was looking to jump ship to Scotland for a gig over there. I think that was the final straw. The trades he made weren’t great. The Califf one was good. Mwanga is talented and I would have liked to see him develop but so far that hasn’t killed the team. The LeToux trade was awful. They had a falling out and Nowak’s answer was, get rid of him. That was stupid.
    The team now is young, quick, and talented. They are creating more chances and scoring more goals. It’s a shame they squandered almost half the season but if they can get on a run (like they just did winning 3 in a row before losing to NY) they could push for the 5th spot in the East.
    He isn’t the best coach to have for a young developing team. He favors veterans and sits a lot of the younger guys. Hackworth is perfect for this team… especially given his history of development with the US Team U-17′s.
    They will be fine and will continue to get better under Hackworth. The best thing this team did was get rid of Nowak.

  4. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

  5. Tony Ballbags July 24, 2012 at 2:21 pm

    I didn’t think your soccer articles could get anymore dull, but you really raised the bar this time.

  6. I suspect his contract will be validated and that he will be paid. Or they will just settle. “Good faith” means the team had to believe that his actions were not curable. They should have followed the contract. I’m sure it will be easy for Nowak to demonstrate that he has equally as many challenges and that they should have warned him / gave notice more sternly. As in, look, you have 15 days notice and you’ve been warned, your next violation will be considered un-curable and we give us ’cause’ for your immediate termination without pay. Firing him may have been the right decision, but they did it foolishly. It was a pretty big gamble to not take the buyout offer w/ pay, but it just shows he is a risk taker.

  7. @Tim, yes, managers are the ones who make the roster moves, with buying and selling players. Generally, team owners will sign a manager and allow him to shop around for players that fit the way that they want to play the game, whether it’s a typical formation or a style of play. Pep Guardiola, the former Barcelona manager, built his team around Messi, who is short and fast, so he went out and got players that are great at short passing, play the ball on the ground, and have a quick counter attack. That’s why Barcelona is usually very successful. Except, there’s always a way to beat a certain strategy, like how Chelsea beat Barca in the Champions league, but that’s a different story. But yes, essential managers are given all power to make roster moves, but the owners can fire them as they see fit.

  8. Enjoy reading this great article!

Leave a Reply

*

Text formatting is available via select HTML.

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>