Reviewing The Sixers’ Excellent New Red Uniforms

They’ve done it again. The Sixers have taken a design, which maybe wasn’t perfect but didn’t need any tweaking, and have made it better. Truly, addition by addition. Simply re-rendering the 2017 updated uniforms on a red base would have been the easy thing to do. Rather, the Sixers utilized the successful 7+6 star design and added a new, tasteful script version of the “Sixers” wordmark. It is similar to the (never worn) Sixers Christmas jersey of 2016, but that was a league-wide design template, and the 2017 typeface is unique to this application.

The subtle blue drop-shadow gives just enough pop to make the design stand-out. Prior to the 2017 drop-shadows, the numbers and text on the recent uniforms had contributed to the general “retro=dull… but they’re still nice!” feel of the jerseys. This little addition gives the entire set released so far just enough more visual impact to not look like a copy of an “old school” design, but something actually inspired by those designs. Simply executing the 2017 version of the white and blue uniforms in red would have still resulted in a “nice” uniform (maybe not the “fire in the desert” Kyle mentioned, but still a noticeable upgrade from the pre-2017 set). The Sixers, however, took a calculated risk, and it paid off.

BUT, you say the typeface looks out-of-place and maybe even a little wimpy? Well, this isn’t the first time the franchise has dropped way-out-there lettering on what’s thought of as their classic era of uniforms (70s-1991). There’s the, as Kyle calls it, “Doug Collins” era funky block lettering “Sixers” uniform, and there’s also this weirdo sitting in the archives: the 1970-71 white jersey. Woof. Cursive and a shared “S” and everything. Its picture could be in the dictionary next to the entry for “trivia.”

 

both pictures above from the awesome NASL Sixers Gallery

It’s likely not a source of inspiration, but at least we know cursive isn’t unprecedented.

So, maybe there are some things that aren’t great about this new uniform? Well, sticking to the design motif of the blue and white jerseys was nice, but even with a typeface change, I can’t help but notice “PHILA” is in all-caps on those jerseys while “Sixers” on the red jersey isn’t. Yes, this is nitpicking – I’m actively trying to find something wrong here – and all upper or lowercase cursive wouldn’t be a great look. There are some people on Twitter who have pointed out the little thing between the I and the X in Sixers, including Keith Olbermann:

It’s the tail of the X, and though I can see how it looks a bit out-of-place if you stare at it real hard, it generally doesn’t bother me.

Also, with the three released (of four, total) uniform designs all evoking the same general era of the team… what about the 90s? Awful 90s design is back in style big time, and even in cynical terms, the fans clambering for a Shawn Bradley-era jersey (you pick: tacky, awful, and amazing or actually pretty nice and way underrated) or even Iverson era jersey are of the age where they have the money to spend now. Even more cynically, someone with a current white jersey isn’t going to buy the blue jersey (and vice versa). Maybe they’d consider the red one, but the fourth jersey needs to be something way off the reservation, hopefully evoking something other than the same window of time the three released jerseys do. Additionally, I LOVED the contrasting red numbers on the white jerseys which were lost in the 2015 re-design. The new drop-shadow helps, but it’s just not the same. [Editor’s note: I couldn’t disagree more on this.] Finally, these uniforms would look a lot better without any ads on them, but such is 2017.

Final Verdict: My thumb is way up. No one would have guessed this was where the design was going, and it successfully underlines why the approaches of “not too different from everything else” and “let’s rock the boat, but just a little” are appreciably different. It’s another addition by addition move by Sixers uniform designers; they pulled it off in 2015 and 2017. Let’s hope for something equally exciting for 2017’s fourth uniform.

I’m also going to point out the slickness of choosing to use a tiny drop shadow on all three (so far) of this year’s jerseys instead of the stroke/outline that had been used in the later years of the “classic” design. It’s a tiny distinction, but it makes it 2017’s jersey, not 1988’s.

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
Share on email
Email

14 Comments

  • It's a Clippers Jersey September 14, 2017 at 10:26 am

    It’s a Clippers jersey.

    Reply
    • Charles from the Northeast September 14, 2017 at 11:02 am

      Joel Embiid
      Carson Wentz
      Ben Simmons
      Rhys Hoskins

      I’m sorry but I can’t think of any young up and coming Flyers to put on this list of Philadelphia sports players with superstar potential.

      OK OK

      Reply
  • JEFFREY WUHL September 14, 2017 at 10:36 am

    I owned one of those Barkley jerseys as a kid. They’re almost classic now. Would love it if the 4th jersey was some sort of homage to that.

    Reply
  • Howie Roseman Fan Club President September 14, 2017 at 10:50 am

    So is it the Suxers or the Slixers?

    Reply
    • Howie Roseman Fan Club President September 14, 2017 at 10:52 am

      That error leads me to believe they didn’t even have an artist design the text by hand. They used a font. That’s lazy and sloppy.

      Reply
  • TS September 14, 2017 at 10:52 am

    nice color, but it doesn’t look right….I haven’t written in cursive in a LONG time, but there is like an extra something between the I and the X that just doesn’t belong there….

    Reply
  • Tom Selleck September 14, 2017 at 10:53 am

    im calling it will be the horizontal red/white Sixers jersey from 65-66 or if they really want nostalgia the 91-94 shooting stars jerseys

    Reply
  • Enough Already! September 14, 2017 at 10:58 am

    Seriously enough with the uniform posts! I thought we were done with this shit when the site was relaunched.

    Reply
    • kyle scott September 14, 2017 at 11:04 am

      Ha! You must be one of those who took the bait. I am doubling down on repackaging info that can easily be found elsewhere. Stay tuned for more podcasts and articles fixating on what WIP and 97.5 are up to! And subscribe if you want juicy insider information from the college kids I hired!

      Reply
    • Kyle Scott September 14, 2017 at 1:44 pm

      Fun comment. But worth pointing out that we broke the uniform stuff stuff yesterday and that this post is entirely original content.

      Reply
  • Brett, Larry and Kwame Brown September 14, 2017 at 2:45 pm

    Ahh, you found the “Seventy-Sixers” unies I so want to see again someday, except the “Seventy” part should be the same size as the “Sixers” typeface next time around, with “Seventy-Sixers” in blue, and the numbers in red.

    Reply
  • Poor Roy Rubin's ghost September 14, 2017 at 2:49 pm

    In one game in 1972, the Daily News had a picture of Billy C. and Doggie Carter in game action, with Billy wearing “Seventy-Sixers”, and Doggie the ’70’s style “Sixers” block, which the team switched over to that season. Why did Kangaroo wear “Seventy-Sixers” that day? That was never explained.

    Reply
  • Crazy Joe Davola September 14, 2017 at 3:15 pm

    Not B other than that font

    Reply
  • Paul September 14, 2017 at 4:10 pm

    I don’t know why no one has noticed what I’m about to say…it’s NOT cursive. Cursive writing is a continuous pen stroke. If you look at the letters, each letter is written individually, and the end of each letter happens to run into the next letter. Note that the end of the x doesn’t run into the beginning of the e like it would if it were true cursive. Every letter is written individually in script, including the x – and that’s why the x has the tail next to the i.

    I know this is overly analytical for this comments section, but the x isn’t an error, bottom line.

    Reply
  • Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *