Marcus Hayes believes so.

Today the Inquirer columnist spoke again with the local freelancer who recently published via Philly Voice a story titled, Exclusive: Sources inside Eagles paint Carson Wentz as ‘selfish,’ ‘uncompromising’ and ‘playing favorites’. You know the story. You probably read it and listened to sports radio dissect everything about it over the past two weeks.

Wentz spoke Thursday with a half-dozen Eagles beat writers to offer a response to the article, a 23-minute sit down interview that was held under embargo until this morning.

In that response, Wentz admitted this:

“It’s never fun to read, but to an extent, you look at it and be like, ‘Well, if someone did have this perception of me, why? What have I done wrong? What can I get better at?’ I realize I have my shortcomings. Yes, I can be selfish. I think we all have selfishness inside of us. There’s human elements to that, that I really look at and say, ‘Well, I can get better.’ I always say I can be better on the field, off the field, how I carry myself.”

That was just one quote, but in other parts of the interview, he directly pushed back against some of the claims made via Santoliquito’s sources, such as the idea that he “bullied” offensive coordinator Mike Groh or did not want to run plays that Nick Foles preferred.

I’m not sure about you, but I thought Carson came across as thoughtful and reasonable in the way he responded to the piece. The quotes struck me as contemplative on paper, but of course we’d have to be sitting in the room to hear how he sounded or observe his tone and body language. Only Sheil Kapadia, Tim McManus, Jeff McLane, Zach Berman, Dave Zangaro, and Reuben Frank would be able to comment properly on that.

The truth, like most things, is probably somewhere in the middle. Sure, it sounded like Carson was certainly “uncompromising” in some areas while not exactly being a locker room cancer in others. A lot of people were quick to dismiss the story while others gave it thought.

Hayes believes that Wentz’s responses now “vindicate” Santoliquito, as written in today’s column.

Hayes reveals that somebody left dog shit inside Joe’s mailbox, damaged his back door, and smashed his neighbor’s windshield.

Writes Marcus:

Today, though, the sun shone bright in Santoliquito’s world for the first time since he published a piece for PhillyVoice on Jan. 21 that used anonymous sources to paint Carson Wentz as a selfish bully who played favorites this season. Why?

Because Wentz admitted in an interview published Monday morning that the sources weren’t wrong: “I’m not going to sit here and say it was inaccurate and completely made up. … I can be selfish. … Maybe wasn’t the greatest teammate at times.”

Wentz stopped short of agreeing that his shortcomings short-circuited the offense, and he downplayed the depiction of conflict between him and his teammates and coaches. Nevertheless, the tenor of the interview was that Wentz realized that, as the face of the franchise and the most important player, he at least needs to be more inclusive.

Santoliquito is relieved.

“I feel like my credibility is back. I feel validated,” Santoliquito said Monday morning.

More from Hayes after the jump:

He enjoyed a measure of fame — or notoriety, depending on your perspective — after his story hit, mostly from outlets eager to question his integrity. Monday, he dealt with a deluge of 15 fresh media requests. He ignored almost all of them. He didn’t feel like he needed to defend himself any more.

“I just feel like people know I didn’t make this up,” he said.” It didn’t come out of the blue.”

Russ and I discussed this at length on the “Five for Five” Crossing Broadcast. I sat on the fence because I know Matt Mullin and the people I used to work with at Voice wouldn’t publish something of that nature unless they believed in the reporting and the reporter. I think Joe came across as defensive in the multiple interviews he gave, but it’s not like he backed down or what was originally written.

Shrug.

So you tell me, reading the quotes that Carson Wentz gave to reporters last week, is Joe Santoliquito vindicated?

Does Carson Wentz's response vindicate Joe Santoliquito?

To end the article, I present this exchange, without commentary, for your consideration:

Time’s yours.