Villanova Doesn’t Deserve to be in the Tournament

Kyle Scott —  March 9, 2011 — 10 Comments

Jay_wright

The haters are going to come out in full force on this one. The anti-Nova crowd is going to criticize me for being a hypocrite. The Nova apologists are going to hate anything negative anyone says about Nova.

It's a lose-lose scenario. Plowing ahead… 

Last night's debacle can be used as microcosm for the entire season. Villanova played a strong first half against sub par competition. This allowed them to built up a large, 16 point halftime lead. They had done little to prove they rebounded from their late season funk, but looked good enough to make us all believe anyway.

Then, instead of going in for the kill, they played a passive brand of basketball that allowed South Florida to get back into the game. That, coupled with their shots not falling (0-for-5 from three in second half), completely erased the lead. Yet, Villanova was still left with a chance to win the game. They didn't. They blew it in epic fashion, missing two critical free throws and turning the ball over on the second of two poorly designed inbounds plays. They didn't deserve to win.

And that's really how this season went: a strong start against mostly weak competition was erased by poor play in the end. 

 

I was wrong 

In January, after watching Villanova soundly beat Louisville, I was convinced that they had turned a corner and put last year's disappointing finish to rest. In fact, I declared them a Final Four contender.

As someone who went to Villanova, starting in the same year as Jay Wright (2001), I would venture to guess I've seen about 90% of the games he’s coached there. That other 10% is mostly games that weren't televised. I would also hedge a bet that I've attended about 80% of Villanova’s home games in Wright’s time, covering some of them for the student newspaper. I felt (still do) that qualified me to proclaim them legitimate Final Four contenders. 

During the Louisville game, it looked as though Villanova had finally put it all together. They were moving the ball efficiently, taking good shots, and forcing turnovers by outworking the opponent. In effect, they were – as cliché as it sounds – playing Villanova basketball. A brand of the sport they hadn't played in nearly two years.

A few days after that Louisville game, they beat a sub-par Maryland team. They again looked good, both literally and figuratively. That day, they debuted new Nike Hyper Elite Jerseys, the same ones worn by the likes of Duke and Kentucky. Perhaps they were bad luck.

 

Down the stretch

In the 15 games Villanova has played since beating the Terps, they are 5-10. 5-10.

Those 10 games include double-digit losses to Providence, St. Johns, Notre Dame, and Pitt… home losses to Georgetown, Pitt, Syracuse, and St. Johns… and devastating losses to Rutgers and South Florida. Rutgers and South Florida. 

Their wins? Not too shabby: Syracuse, Marquette, West Virginia, Seton Hall and DePaul. However, they barely squeaked by Seton Hall (by 3) and needed overtime to beat dreadful DePaul. Syracuse was the lone ranked team (at the time of the games) they beat during that stretch.

Prior to that point, Villanova beat aforementioned Louisville and Cincinnati- both top 25 teams. They will get into the tournament based on those wins. But when you look at it more closely, you begin to understand that those wins aren't all that impressive. They are against teams ranked 16, 18, and 21 in the RPI, respectively. That doesn't exactly make them elite. 

Villanova is also 3-8 (3-7 RPI top 25) against ranked teams. When you play 11 top 25 teams, you're bound to win a few of the games. Villanova won the easier ones. Still, that team, the one that beat those schools (along with Temple, Marquette, and UCLA) will get into the tournament. 

Here's the problem: Villanova, as we see them today, is not the same team.

 

What happened?

Maybe it wasn't even the Maryland game… or the jerseys. Not only is Villanova 0-5 to end the season – by the way, a team has never lost five straight games to end the season and made the NCAA Tournament – but they are also 2-6 since playing Pitt on College Gameday. Perhaps it's ESPN's show cursing Villanova. Last year, they were 2-4 after playing Syracuse during the same event.  

No, that's not it.

I'm a big believer in the eye test. Numbers can only tell you so much. They can only tell part of the story. In this case, 0-5, three wins against top 25, and 21-11 only tell you part of the story. The team that lost to South Florida last night is not the same team that went 16-1 to start the season.

 

This isn’t new

Young players have struggled down the stretch for Jay. In 2003 and 2004, when Allan Ray and Randy Foye were underclassmen, the team struggled mightily in February and March- barely making the NIT in 2003. In 2008, when Scottie Reynolds was a sophomore and the Coreys, Fisher and Stokes, were Freshmen, the same thing happened, as Villanova slid its way into a 12 seed. Last year, with Maalik Wayns and Dominic Cheek as freshman? Same result.  

In case you haven't noticed, Wright runs very few offensive sets. Instead, he uses a motion offense to rotate his highly skilled ball handlers into mismatches. It's a thing of beauty when it's working- like it was in 2005 (sweet 16), 2006 (elite 8), and 2009 (final four). When it's not working, the team winds up with four field goals in a half- like they did last night.

The system relies heavily on players making good decisions. Wayns, who is one of the primary ball handlers on this year's team, is not there yet. That doesn't mean he won't be – it took Foye and Ray two years to get the hang of it. But he’s not there yet. Cheek and Isaiah Armwood suffer from the same problem. And Fisher and Stokes, who are both seniors, aren't doing a very good job of handling the load.  

What you're left with is a bunch of bad shots, snuffed-out pick-and-rolls, and a lot of dribbling to nowhere. Sometimes you just need a few set plays. Villanova doesn't have them. 

I'm reminded of a moment in the 2008 game against St. Joes – which Villanova was blown out in – when a frantic Scottie Reynolds waved off all of his teammates as if to say "get out, I got this." It gets real ugly, folks.

That's the team we're seeing now. A team that can't right itself when the going gets tough. A team that looks lost on the floor. 

On top of that, you have Armwood punching guys on the court, Wayns wearing blinders, and Stokes displaying almost zero improvement since his sophomore year. What that leaves us with is a 5-10 team that is entirely different from the 16-1 team that started the year. A team that is likely going to make the NCAA Tournament. Heck, they’re even talented enough to win a couple of games in the dance by accident. But, from what we’ve seen on the court – epic, mind-numbing losses and careless play – Villanova doesn’t deserve that chance.

When you take their body of work as a whole, the way the selection committee will, you see a record deserving of a bid. However, if you’ve seen the slop that’s been put on the court in the second half of the season, you understand that Villanova is in no way an NCAA Tournament team. 

By the time the big dance starts, it will have been almost a month since Villanova’s last win- an overtime victory against DePaul.

Kyle Scott

Posts Twitter Facebook Google+

Editor

10 responses to Villanova Doesn’t Deserve to be in the Tournament

  1. Great read. Nice job…you can feel the passion/pain/anger from an alum in the writing.

  2. As much as this pains me to say, I agree with you. I worship at the at the alter of Jay Wright but this team is not worthy of the tournament.

  3. Agreed after watching them beat themselves last night, and going 5-10, while losing their last five they do not deserve an at large bid. I also think the NCAA selection committee was looking for any excuse to trim the amount of Big East teams in the tourney and Villanova gave them one. Not to mention as reported last night, NO team has made the field of 64 after losing their last 5 games.

  4. Kudos for taking the high road and admitting your mistake in a thoughtful, well-written commentary.
    As a classmate of yours and someone who’s similarly followed the Jay Wright (and Lappas, throw in a few Rollie) era games, I am disappointed by your analysis. You thesis is spot-on: Nova is playing lackluster ball and likely undeserving of a tournament bid (mid-major tournament results notwithstanding) based on their recent play. However you miss two critical and determining factors in the Cats’ recent woes: first, their two best players, Stokes and Fisher, have played through nagging but not mild injuries. Both have struggled. Secondly, Nova lost games to UConn, Gtown, Rutgers, Pitt, Syracuse(v2.0) and South FL by a single possession. Generally speaking, they shot the ball poorly and were out-rebounded in these games. Fisher has shown an ability throughout his career to hit big shots late in meaningful games (Cuse II aside). Stokes is their best pure shooter and strong fundamentally on the glass. Missing both of these players seriously impaired the team’s ability to close out close games and was the leading determinant in Villanova’s utter lack of confidence and success down the stretch.

  5. It’s been a painful february and march!!!!!!!!!

  6. will- i agree, but i really don’t think either injury was enough to cause this 5-10 disaster. stokes doesn’t make much of a difference when he’s in there. and the close losses are easily upset by the 4 double digit losses, not to mention the close wins over crappy teams. my thoughts, at least.

  7. Although im not a nova guy, this was a great read, and im glad you didnt play the injury card. That would’ve just looked like you were looking for excuses.

  8. ThePhillyFlash March 10, 2011 at 4:48 am

    Great piece there, Kyle. Losing to South Florida was flat out inexcusable and should NEVER have happened. PERIOD! While I agree that the Wildcats are undeserving of a berth in the Big Dance thanks to their collapse, chances are pretty much excellent they’ll get in anyway, mainly on reputation if no other reason, but they’ll probably be no better than an eight or nine seed. Given how poorly ‘Nova’s played of late, I see one round and done written all over this bunch.

  9. Why is everyone afraid to say that Corey Fisher has choked our season away… This guy has more sneaky, unimportant PPG than any player I’ve ever seen.. Jay put the whole season on his shoulders (which at the time I thought was a mistake – see that ridiculous cartoon in the SI preview) and it proved to in fact be a mistake. He’s simply not a leader, he plays scared, and takes terrible shots (if he bothers to get it off before the shot clock). How does Jay not sniff that out beforehand? All we heard leading into the year was, ‘oh man just wait until the shackles come of Fisher, oh man- just wait…’ Still waiting…
    I believe that Stokes is truly injured, I don’t think that Stokes is.. call me an asshole if you want but I call bullshit.. (happy to be proven wrong by upcoming MRI). How else would you justify playing Malik in crunch time when you’ve hyped Fisher so hard, but for a mysterious boo-boo?
    Question: Was that the first time Malik had inbounded the ball at that time of the game and position on court (at the hash). I don’t remember seeing that all year… why on earth have Wayans to Pena instead of the other way around? Mismatch-smishmash.
    Hopefully bw now and the tournament ‘we talkin’ bout practice.’
    As always, your fine reporting and take is appreciated.

  10. Woops.. should read.. “Stokes is truly injured, I don’t think FISHER is.”
    I’m dumb.

Leave a Reply

*

Text formatting is available via select HTML.

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>